Teams

TP Fireballs - T. Sturdevant

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over - Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-05vs Hills/Perpetua/18&Over3.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Nikki Spirakis vs Anjali Singh / Danielle Lindblom2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dasilva vs Chelsea Johns1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Stephanie Rumbley / Margaret Mariani6-3, 6-2
2024-02-20vs Avila - M. MillikenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dasilva vs Giliane Rifai6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hoyord / Tina Sturdevant vs Marguerite Milliken / Summar Robinson6-1, 6-1
2024-02-13vs Buckhorn Acers - S. MosherSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSherry Peterson / Nikki Spirakis vs Lauren Jensen / Susan MOSHER7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dasilva vs Dionesia Ibanez4-6, 4-6
2024-02-06vs SVB Dolls with Balls - Q. TonnuSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNikki Spirakis / Tina Sturdevant vs QuynhTran Tonnu / Wei Xue6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dasilva vs Danna Sturman2-6, 3-6
2024-01-30vs Riverhills Double Shots - D. FlairLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Tammy Miller vs Kitty Sanchez / Jackie Wyckoff2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dasilva vs Emma Rampone3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Tammy Miller vs Neha Bishnoi / Fabiola Morales6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesNikki Spirakis / Tammy Miller vs Barbara Brosch / Katie Krysa5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dasilva vs Crystal Shanique Bethel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Catherine Hoyord vs Laura Long / Cheri Snyder4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Cille Williams
published 3
2.96
Hyun Kim
published
2.92
Elizabeth Dasilva
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.88
Nikki Spirakis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Sherry Peterson
published
2.76
Karen Cachion
published
2.71
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.70
Tammy Miller
published
2.64
Elizabeth DeConti
published
2.63
Tina Sturdevant
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.56
Jihea Helme
published
2.54
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.50
Catherine Hoyord
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Spirakis + Tina Sturdevant412454% games+0.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Dasilva + Nikki Spirakis7255% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Dasilva + Tina Sturdevant2345% gamesnot enough data
Tina Sturdevant + Sherry Peterson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cille Williams
62W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Hyun Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Nikki Spirakis
120W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
2.88
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Karen Cachion
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Tammy Miller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Elizabeth DeConti
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–132L career · 7 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Catherine Hoyord
4W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.