Teams

TING.Tandon

2024 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesVijay Rajasekar / Neelakantam Jarugumalli vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-20vs TOC.GiriLost 02
L#1 DoublesRam Basireddy / Saikrishna Kondaraju vs Shiv Giri / Luis Bello SR1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRishi Tandon / Vijay Rajasekar vs Pradeep Hariharan / Ajit Shankardas3-6, 5-7
2024-04-13vs PW.BlondellLost 01
L#2 DoublesPramod Navani / Ram Basireddy vs David McDaniel / Blake Hall5-7, 3-6
2024-04-06vs TOC.GuptaLost 02
L#1 SinglesVijay Rajasekar vs Sumit Parimoo2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRam Basireddy / Susanta Padhi vs Ryan Jobling / Vishal Gupta4-6, 1-6
2024-03-20vs KF.DanielLost 02
L#2 DoublesRishi Tandon / Vijay Rajasekar vs Jeff Brown / John Latzy6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNeelakantam Jarugumalli / Susanta Padhi vs Kevin Fitzcharles / Randy Myers4-6, 2-6
2024-03-16vs MCSP.HofbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesPramod Navani / Ram Basireddy vs R Gregory Hughes / Marc Hastings6-2, 7-6
2024-02-17vs TOC.NealisLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusanta Padhi / Ram Basireddy vs Ryan Goff / Charles Gordon5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNeelakantam Jarugumalli / John Doe vs Chris Johnson / Daniel Moore7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Neelakantam Jarugumalli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Rishi Tandon
published
3.29
Susanta Padhi
published
3.27
Vijay Rajasekar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Nagarajan Janagar
published
3.08
Arpit Shah
published 3.5
2.98
Ram Basireddy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neelakantam Jarugumalli + Vijay Rajasekar224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Neelakantam Jarugumalli
64W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Rishi Tandon
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
Susanta Padhi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Vijay Rajasekar
37W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Nagarajan Janagar
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Arpit Shah
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Ram Basireddy
52W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.