Teams

Moore/HCP/Foothills

2024 Foothills Combo Doubles - 55 & Over · 6.5 Combo Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-05vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChris Summers / Staci Shafer vs Cheri Johnson / Kimberley Pennington3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Moore / Rhonda Kiser vs Ronda Champion / Debra Abrams6-4, 6-2
2024-09-21vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kiser / Chris Summers vs Betty Hollingsworth / Cheri Johnson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-14vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChapel Davis / Kelli Schmidt vs Cheri Johnson / Kimberley Pennington6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Moore / Denise Moose vs Liza Dellinger / Lisa McFarland5-7, 5-7
2024-09-07vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesRhonda Kiser / Chris Summers vs Lisa McFarland / Debra Abrams6-1, 7-5
2024-08-31vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelli Schmidt / Chapel Davis vs Becky Boinest / Cheri Johnson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Moore / Rhonda Kiser vs Wanda Page / Betty Hollingsworth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChapel Davis / Deborah Pitts vs Lori Martinez / Becky Boinest2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
DeAnna Finger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Kelli Schmidt
published
3.13
Denise Moose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kathy Collins
published
2.95
Chris Summers
published 3
2.92
Rhonda Kiser
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Staci Shafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Chapel Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
LYNN BRUTON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci Shafer + Kathy Collins8162% games+15.6% vs expected
Staci Shafer + Rhonda Kiser404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DeAnna Finger
61W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kelli Schmidt
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Denise Moose
51W–62L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kathy Collins
31W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Chris Summers
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Rhonda Kiser
170W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Staci Shafer
196W–223L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Chapel Davis
87W–97L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
LYNN BRUTON
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.