Teams

Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPAR

2025 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Men · 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Men

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-05vs Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARWon 21
L#1 DoublesTaylor Pyles / Jackson Matthews vs John Wakeman / Johnson Sadiq2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNick Hawkland vs David Long6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Simpson / Glenn Theis vs Lane Odom / George Seacrist2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-29vs Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARWon 31
L#1 DoublesJackson Matthews / Glenn Theis vs Clint Johnson / Ronnie Sanderson0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNick Hawkland vs Sutton Cart6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrad Simpson / Taylor Pyles vs Chris Long / John Wakeman6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKeith Sternitzky vs Lane Odom6-2, 6-3
2025-03-22vs Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARWon 21
L#1 DoublesJackson Matthews / John Boone vs Lane Odom / John Wakeman1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNick Hawkland vs Clint Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTaylor Pyles vs Sutton Cart6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackson Matthews / Glenn Theis vs Chris Long / David Long0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTaylor Pyles vs Ronnie Sanderson1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesNick Hawkland vs Lane Odom6-4, 7-5
2025-03-08vs Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARLost 23
L#1 DoublesJackson Matthews / Nick Hawkland vs John Wakeman / Chris Long4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKeith Sternitzky vs George Seacrist6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Boone / Brad Simpson vs Lane Odom / Ronnie Sanderson3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBynum Miller vs Johnson Sadiq1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTaylor Pyles / Glenn Theis vs David Long / Clint Johnson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPAR32111431220
2Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPAR23101530198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bynum Miller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Glenn Theis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jackson Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
John Boone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Sternitzky
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Nick Hawkland
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Taylor Pyles
usually #2 Singles 20%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brad Simpson
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bynum Miller
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Glenn Theis
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Jackson Matthews
0W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Boone
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Sternitzky
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Hawkland
7W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Pyles
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.