Teams

MLong-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-09vs LBible-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesTracy Rose vs Dana Cantrell3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesClare Stull vs Keshia Green3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs KCaravella-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesRANEE KUMAR vs Madison Collier1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesDeanna Lape vs Katherine Beall6-0, 6-3
2026-06-17vs ACharleston-DURWon 20
W#2 SinglesDeanna Lape vs Lexi Yakoobian6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTracy Rose vs Wilton Burns6-3, 6-3
2026-06-10vs LKulp-SVCLost 12
W#1 SinglesClare Stull vs Janelle Howard7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPolly Creveling vs Jamie Moy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRANEE KUMAR vs Erin McElligott2-6, 3-6
2026-06-03vs SLawrence-TOCHWon 20
W#1 SinglesTracy Rose vs Aine Lynch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesClare Stull vs Sydney Greenberg6-0, 6-1
2026-05-27vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesClare Stull vs Lora Alkhawam3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPolly Creveling vs Kim McWhorter1-6, 3-6
2026-05-20vs EMillard-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesTracy Rose vs Kathryn Howington6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKelsey Mortimore vs Emma Gould6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesClare Stull vs Elyssa Millard6-1
2026-05-13vs LHeymann-UNCWon 30
W#1 SinglesPolly Creveling vs Marianne Gildea6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTracy Rose vs Julia Haslett6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDeanna Lape vs Meghan Fulton6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Clare Stull
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Deanna Lape
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Tracy Rose
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.28
Polly Creveling
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.02
RANEE KUMAR
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 3
2.89
Kelsey Mortimore
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Mary T Long
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary T Long + RANEE KUMAR224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clare Stull
6W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Deanna Lape
142W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Tracy Rose
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Polly Creveling
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3
RANEE KUMAR
43W–103L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kelsey Mortimore
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.