Teams

CC Avila Lee 7.0 Mixed

2025 USTA CC Spring Mixed Doubles 40 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 7.0 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-05vs CC MBHS Hostetter 7.0 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Decker / Brianna Decker vs Jennifer Manduffie / Robert Simons2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStuart Marshall / Melbra King vs Karen Meertens / William Saiki3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Greco / Ramona Friedman vs Amy Stets / Mark Manduffie6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-12vs CC MBHS Hostetter 7.0 MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Lee / David Tuttle vs Aryn Jorgensen / Kenneth Jorgensen2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Swanson / Jeong Woo vs Jennifer Manduffie / Anthony Mendoza6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Bailey / Cherie Charbonneau vs Amy Stets / Mark Manduffie4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 7.0 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
David Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Jeong Woo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Travis Allen
published
Ann Brewer
published 3.5
3.25
Brianna Decker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Marie Murphy
published
3.17
Jayne Engle Allen
published
3.10
Ramona Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Cherie Charbonneau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Melbra King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Claire Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jonathan Decker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Greco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramona Friedman + Josh Greco1542% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Decker + Brianna Decker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Tuttle
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Jeong Woo
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Travis Allen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ann Brewer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brianna Decker
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Marie Murphy
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Jayne Engle Allen
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Ramona Friedman
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
Melbra King
14W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Claire Lee
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Decker
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Josh Greco
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stuart Marshall
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.