Teams

KC YELLOW

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-06vs LEBTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Hursta / Brian Sandy vs Nathaniel Morgan / Andy Fishering6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesReed Haddock / Damon Cable vs Gary Dong / Thomas Devine3-6, 6-7
2021-08-30vs CCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesDamon Cable / Brian Sandy vs Brad Weber / Nick Poulos6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Hursta vs Jason Wagner6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesReed Haddock / Audie Rubin vs Craig Evans / Craig Myles2-6, 2-6
2021-08-23vs KC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesReed Haddock / Audie Rubin vs Robert Carlson / Keith Andrew6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Hursta / Damon Cable vs Ben MacDonald / Brad Goulding6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-16vs PH REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudie Rubin / James Lord vs Jim Martin / Nick Politano3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Hursta vs Chris Pettofrezzo6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDamon Cable / Jon Moore vs Michael Main / Charles Bellows4-6, 3-6
2021-08-02vs BM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudie Rubin / James Lord vs Tony Parkin / Andy Jenkins5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Sandy vs Andrew Swanson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesReed Haddock / Jon Moore vs Chris Kurz / Dan Miller6-4, 6-4
2021-07-26vs BCST ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesReed Haddock / Jon Moore vs Steve Monroe / Mark Lindel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDamon Cable / Brian Sandy vs Jeff Todd / Brett Harvey7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Michael Hursta
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Brian Sandy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Damon Cable
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Audie Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Reed Haddock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jon Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reed Haddock + Audie Rubin134 matchesnot enough data
Audie Rubin + Damon Cable224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Sandy + Michael Hursta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michael Hursta
98W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Brian Sandy
58W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3
Damon Cable
41W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Audie Rubin
52W–51L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Reed Haddock
77W–64L career · 5 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jon Moore
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.