Teams

Ke.Nels40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-11vs Ja.Bossert40C2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesErin Reis / Kelly Nels vs Jane Bossert / Mari Stratemeier6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Ke.Hurter40C2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Kelly Nels vs Allison Bubar / Rebecca Harris2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Peterson / Jessica Tyndall vs Angela McGee / Kelly Hurter3-6, 4-6
2025-09-27vs Su.Potter40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarrie Martinelli / Erin Reis vs Kelly Thompson / Kari Marotta6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Jana Askeland vs Susan Potter / Susan Gentry3-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs Me.McCaskill40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Martinelli / Jessica Tyndall vs Meredith McCaskill / CarolAnn Wiggs6-2, 7-6
2025-09-06vs De.Farmer40C2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesErin Reis / Jana Askeland vs Tiffany Scotton / Clarissa McMathis6-1, 6-1
2025-08-30vs Ja.Bossert40C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Kelly Nels vs Margaret Barham / Mari Stratemeier4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-23vs Ke.Hurter40C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Stephanie Ratliff vs Rebecca Harris / Meagan Moore1-6, 2-6
2025-08-16vs Su.Potter40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Reis / Jessica Tyndall vs Darsan Russo / Kelly Thompson7-5, 6-3
2025-08-10vs De.Farmer40C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Martinelli / Kelly Nels vs Patrice Farmer / Katherine Clarida6-0, 6-1
2025-08-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Gentile / Kelly Nels vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Kelly Nels
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.66
Erin Reis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.62
Lauren Gentile
published
2.62
Jessica Tyndall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.39
Jana Askeland
published
2.31
Nicole Nemmers
published
2.24
Jessica Oehlrich
published
Sherri Wichek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Nels + Lauren Gentile7082% games+20.2% vs expected
Jessica Tyndall + Kelly Nels4255% gamesnot enough data
Erin Reis + Kelly Nels5068% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Tyndall + Erin Reis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Kelly Nels
69W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
3
Carrie Martinelli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Erin Reis
51W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Lauren Gentile
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
47W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Jana Askeland
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Nicole Nemmers
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Jessica Oehlrich
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Sherri Wichek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.