Teams

Racqueteers

2025 Prince Georges Tri-Level · Prince Georges Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesLourdes Sanchez / Eveline Shum vs Beverly Taylor / Lisa Reid6-2, 6-3
2025-08-26vs Serving YouLost 02
L#1 DoublesKara Stegeman / Diem Salmon vs Shyrelle Eubanks / Deborah Thompson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLourdes Sanchez / Eveline Shum vs Abriana Walls / Natalie Walker5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-24vs LoVV Low-TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiem Salmon / Carina Villagra vs Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor / Andaiye Hamilton5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Torres / Eveline Shum vs Janaya Thompson / Tammie Wiley4-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs LoVV Low-TriLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Torres / Calle Cone vs Terri Windsor / Janaya Thompson4-6, 3-6
2025-07-30vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesCalle Cone / Kara Stegeman vs Leslie Fields / April Copes6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-13vs LoVV Low-TriWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Stegeman / Ruth Go Fernando Randle vs Cynthia Clinton Brown / Andaiye Hamilton2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCalle Cone / Andrea Torres vs Tammie Wiley / ANEESAH WILLIAMS4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEveline Shum / Lourdes Sanchez vs Stephanie Smith / Kashama McKenna7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Diem Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kara Stegeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.20
3.18
Carina Villagra
published 3.5
2.91
Angela Sharma
published 3
2.69
Andrea Torres
published 3
2.54
Eveline Shum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Calle Cone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Tiffany Ashton
published
2.40
Lourdes Sanchez
published
2.25
Susan Timoney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eveline Shum + Lourdes Sanchez134 matchesnot enough data
Eveline Shum + Angela Sharma123 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Go Fernando Randle + Kara Stegeman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diem Salmon
62W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3
Kara Stegeman
81W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carina Villagra
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Andrea Torres
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Eveline Shum
46W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Calle Cone
42W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Tiffany Ashton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Lourdes Sanchez
32W–45L career · no lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
Susan Timoney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.