Teams

KC-CC TEAL

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-28vs HRCA-N ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Johnson / Pauline Vargo vs Alison Cargo / Lydia Sfeir1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Broadway / Magdalena Smith vs Emily Lubojacky / Megan Rothey2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Copenhaver / Carla Minckley vs Joanna Anderson / Kelin Williams4-6, 3-6
2026-05-18vs SS-LGT YELLOWLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnnamaria Augustine / Jenna Sellers vs Ruth Dullea / Clara Lee6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPauline Vargo vs Lori Wood2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Johnson / Magdalena Smith vs Tracy Corbett / Kari Samborski2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Greco / Mary Wright vs Amy Cimbura / Emily Zawacki7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs BCST NAVYLost 23
W#1 DoublesJenna Sellers / Nathalia Urbano vs Beth Leon / Mary Mucilli6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPauline Vargo vs Meghan Ciacci6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMagdalena Smith / Mary Wright vs Liz Crowell / Amber Todd5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMorgan Broadway vs Colleen Callahan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Greco / Annamaria Augustine vs Darci Howell / Alison Otoole6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-11vs LEBTC BLUELost 05
L#1 DoublesMeredith Johnson / Magdalena Smith vs Amee Auberry / Lisa Garbin4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJenna Sellers vs Christine Parsons1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Copenhaver / Nathalia Urbano vs Leann Koontz / Kara Edmiston Lavaux3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAnnamaria Augustine vs Rebecca Molstad5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Greco / Morgan Broadway vs Jamie Gardner / Monica Panczer1-6, 1-6
2026-04-27vs CCC TEALLost 23
W#1 DoublesJenna Sellers / Pauline Vargo vs Amy Leonard / Melissa Penza6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeredith Johnson vs Kim Raemdonck2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Copenhaver / Carla Minckley vs Sarah Johnson / Emily Mcgrath6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAnnamaria Augustine vs Sara Griffith1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMorgan Broadway / Judy Greco vs Kate Cihon / Holly Williams0-6, 2-6
2026-04-20vs SS-LGT ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesNathalia Urbano / Carla Minckley vs Sara Knudsen / Jennifer Moeller2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPauline Vargo vs Diana Treinen1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Copenhaver / Morgan Broadway vs Jessica Asherin / Jailyn Volok0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJenna Sellers vs Naomi Arellano1-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs KC-RH BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesMary Wright / Pauline Vargo vs Cheryl Amador / Allison Rooney1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnnamaria Augustine vs Jan Dierkes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMorgan Broadway / Nathalia Urbano vs Alicia Pucci / Kim Sandman4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMeredith Johnson vs Erica Smith1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarla Minckley / Sandra Copenhaver vs Christi Hursta / Vicki Calabro6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Pauline Vargo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Meredith Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Annamaria Augustine
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.64
Carla Minckley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Sandra Copenhaver
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
Jenna Sellers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.50
Nathalia Urbano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.47
Magdalena Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.07
Morgan Broadway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Judy Greco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Minckley + Sandra Copenhaver141051% games−0.2% vs expected
Carla Minckley + Magdalena Smith2444% games−5.2% vs expected
Annamaria Augustine + Carla Minckley3556% gamesnot enough data
Carla Minckley + Judy Greco1439% gamesnot enough data
Annamaria Augustine + Pauline Vargo224 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Copenhaver + Magdalena Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Morgan Broadway + Judy Greco044 matchesnot enough data
Annamaria Augustine + Sandra Copenhaver303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Pauline Vargo
23W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Meredith Johnson
10W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Annamaria Augustine
88W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Carla Minckley
83W–80L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Sandra Copenhaver
49W–44L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Jenna Sellers
39W–53L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Nathalia Urbano
25W–66L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Magdalena Smith
9W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
Morgan Broadway
3W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.07
2.5
Judy Greco
22W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.