Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5 W GML Lake Country WAC Schmidt

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesC H / Sarah Griffin vs Alyssa Markuson / Andrea Gromacki1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesStacy Godfrey vs C H6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVicky Schaechterle / Laura Cruse vs Katie Sieberer / Julie Balboni3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesColleen Hutt vs Jennifer Hale6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Seraphine / Amy Drewicz vs Katie Kennedy / Jeri Spangler6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesSarah Griffin / C H vs Kathleen Cooper / Brittany Sugden2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStacy Godfrey vs Cassandra Johnson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Kolo / Deanna Ritter vs Aimee Kohn / Cindy Kowis6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesColleen Hutt vs Jo Ellen Uhrman6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAmy Drewicz / Vicky Schaechterle vs Nancy Buss / Amy Mikelson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesC H / Sarah Griffin vs Sadie Podewils / Jeane Schell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesColleen Hutt vs Sawnie Buehl7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Kolo / Deanna Ritter vs Melanie Kuzmanovic / Cissy Buchta1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCindy Chippindale vs Brenda Loya6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVicky Schaechterle / Laura Cruse vs Cathy Rozewicz / Joyce Coury6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSarah Griffin / C H vs Patricia Hanz / Julie Courtney6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesStacy Godfrey vs Audrey Johnson7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeanna Ritter / Laura Cruse vs Carol Zembinski / Christine Laemmar'Faber6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLori Schiek vs Mindy Harmelink2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Seraphine / Amy Drewicz vs Allyse Jorgensen / Carol Mooren6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesC H / Sarah Griffin vs Lisa Ellegard / Lee Heinrich1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesStacy Godfrey vs Dana Minning7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Chippindale / Colleen Hutt vs Tami Vincent / Suzanne Thomas1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLori Schiek vs Stephanie Winterhalter2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Seraphine / Amy Drewicz vs Danica Olson / Margaret Oteman6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesVicky Schaechterle / Laura Cruse vs Nicole Hesse / Lianne Froemming1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesStacy Godfrey vs Kathy Mueller6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Chippindale / Kelly Kolo vs Margaret Duffy / Wendy Schneller5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLori Schiek vs Nicole Westlind6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Seraphine / Amy Drewicz vs Kathy Hennig / Mary Berg3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesVicky Schaechterle / Laura Cruse vs Alyssa Markuson / Katherine Bohrman0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLori Schiek vs C H7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Griffin / C H vs Andrea Gromacki / Katie Sieberer1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesColleen Hutt vs Jeanne Trowbridge4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Drewicz / Anne Seraphine vs Julie Balboni / Jeri Spangler3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSarah Griffin / C H vs Aimee Kohn / Cassandra Johnson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStacy Godfrey vs Kerri Murphy6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVicky Schaechterle / Laura Cruse vs Nancy Buss / Amy Mikelson6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLori Schiek vs Jo Ellen Uhrman6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Chippindale / Kelly Kolo vs Kristen Field / Brittany Sugden6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sarah Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Amy Drewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anne Seraphine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cindy Chippindale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Colleen Hutt
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Laura Cruse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Deanna Ritter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lori Schiek
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Stacy Godfrey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Vicky Schaechterle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Schaechterle + Laura Cruse3440% games−4.3% vs expected
Anne Seraphine + Amy Drewicz3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Griffin
110W–61L career · 7 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Amy Drewicz
22W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anne Seraphine
19W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Chippindale
12W–11L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Hutt
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Cruse
31W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Deanna Ritter
19W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
Lori Schiek
14W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Godfrey
26W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicky Schaechterle
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.