Teams

Papadropshots

2024 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.78 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-03-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Jayne Korolkoff vs Erin Kim / Loan Nguyen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-15vs Lucky RackettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Etherton / Laura McInerney vs Valerie Ciccone / Kristina Leary5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Daniels / Jennie Kim vs Zheng Dong / Kirah Yen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnie Carey / Robin Khan vs Cintya Leveque / Hannah Yoo4-6, 3-6
2024-03-13vs MaciaWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura McInerney / Annie Carey vs Telesia Hundley / Claudia Holanda6-3, 6-2
2024-03-07vs The MojitosWon 10
W#3 DoublesTana Jankowiak / Annie Carey vs Linda Gowen / Mary Ellen Staggers6-4, 6-2
2024-02-27vs Happy Feet 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Daniels / Jennie Kim vs Evelyn Chan / Jennifer Yang2-6, 4-6
2024-02-21vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Etherton / Kim Daniels vs Regina Farrington / Elizabeth Levy3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-07vs Lucky RackettesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Sarah Schrieber vs Corinne Hart / Lucy Wang1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-01-31vs MaciaWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Latein-Kimmig / Mary Beth Etherton vs Brenda Kaechele / Elizabeth Pugh6-2, 6-1
2024-01-24vs The MojitosWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Jayne Korolkoff vs Shalen Fairbanks / Nancy Trimble6-3, 6-1
2024-01-17vs RubinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Daniels / Jennie Kim vs Tria Thalman / Sharon Sabasteanski7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDawn Forsberg / Mary Beth Etherton vs Michelle Stas / Kristen Donoghue6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-10vs Happy Feet 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Sarah Schrieber vs Tina Halley / Jelena Mitrovic2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dawn Forsberg
published 4
Danielle Woo
published 4
3.70
Mary Papadopulos
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Sarah Schrieber
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.60
Carmen Scurato
published 4
3.60
Maria Vassileva
published
3.58
Rebecca Hammond
published
3.54
Laura McInerney
published
3.44
Yunden Jinsmaa
published
3.37
Annie Carey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.20
Robin Khan
published
3.18
Christine Guelcher
published 3.5
3.12
Joanne Rome
published
3.11
Jayne Korolkoff
published
3.11
Mary Beth Etherton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kim Daniels
published
Laleh Mosavati
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Papadopulos + Jennie Kim314 matchesnot enough data
Jayne Korolkoff + Joanne Rome123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Papadopulos + Annie Carey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Forsberg
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Danielle Woo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Mary Papadopulos
178W–103L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
Sarah Schrieber
39W–43L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Tana Jankowiak
96W–69L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Carmen Scurato
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.60
Maria Vassileva
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
Rebecca Hammond
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Laura McInerney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Yunden Jinsmaa
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Annie Carey
111W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Jennie Kim
265W–126L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Robin Khan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christine Guelcher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Joanne Rome
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Jayne Korolkoff
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Mary Beth Etherton
141W–140L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.11
Kim Daniels
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laleh Mosavati
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.