Teams

Cheaper than Therapy

2026 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-24vs Older & WiserLost 03
L#1 DoublesKanyarat Gallegos / Nancy Hagopian vs Vicki Jamison / Becky Robertson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinny Bell / Laurie Haynes vs Debbie Ellwood / Cathy McCoy4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElaine Yellen / Carron Rapach vs Ann Flanagan / Maggie Pustejovsky2-6, 1-6
2026-03-03vs Older & WiserLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Haynes / Ginny Bell vs Cathy Dooley / Cathy McCoy6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Beyer / Nancy Hagopian vs Ann Flanagan / Maggie Pustejovsky7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKanyarat Gallegos / Chris Scroggs vs Becky Robertson / Laura Bartlett2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Older & Wiser40111469
2Cheaper than Therapy0411122135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Melissa Aceves
published
2.84
Deborah Trevino
published 3
2.82
Ginny Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Kanyarat Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Celista Halpert
published 3
2.66
Cathy Turnbough
published 3
2.58
Nancy Hagopian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Carron Rapach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Chris Scroggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Melanie Beyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Sandra Vasquez
published
Elaine Yellen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Turnbough + Nancy Hagopian213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Aceves
17W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Deborah Trevino
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Ginny Bell
6W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Kanyarat Gallegos
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Celista Halpert
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cathy Turnbough
4W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Nancy Hagopian
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.58
3
Carron Rapach
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52
3
Chris Scroggs
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
Melanie Beyer
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Sandra Vasquez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Elaine Yellen
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laurie Haynes
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.