Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.5W Murray-Peoria

2023 MSIL Adult 18 & Over - MSIL West League · West MSIL A18 & Over 3.5W

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-19vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W McHenry-BloomingtonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Dena Keenan vs Conni Tipsord / Janet Reckard2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrittany Henrich vs Tracey Siems4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Sandborg / Amanda Lawler vs Vicki Buechele / Margaret Hall6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Bennett / Letitia Spirek-Algrain vs Chandra Shanklin / Cara Boester4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-05vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-PekinWon 40
W#1 DoublesPatricia Wombacher / Susan Davis vs Prenda Gannon / Shari Windsor6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesErica Ray vs Allison Cooper6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Bennett / Amalia Krecik vs Joann Blair / Wendy McGill6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanice Zagardo / Letitia Spirek-Algrain vs Sue Chelikas / Roberta Kendzierski6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDena Keenan / Letitia Spirek-Algrain vs Dusty McEwen / Conni Tipsord3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBrittany Henrich vs Tracey Siems0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Murray / Rebecca Sandborg vs Janet Reckard / Margaret Hall6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Bennett / Amalia Krecik vs Susan Tretter / Stephanie Seiler6-2, 6-3
2023-05-08vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-PekinWon 31
W#1 DoublesPatricia Wombacher / Susan Davis vs Michele Kendall / Sue Chelikas6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesErica Ray vs Allison Cooper7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRebecca Sandborg / Janice Zagardo vs Prenda Gannon / Diane Donnelly7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmalia Krecik / Lisa Bennett vs Kris Wertz / Shari Windsor6-3, 6-3
2023-05-01vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W McHenry-BloomingtonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPatricia Wombacher / Susan Davis vs Dusty McEwen / Janet Reckard2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Lawler vs Amy Christianson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Murray / Rebecca Sandborg vs Stephanie Seiler / Kimberly McHenry7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaura Kolb / Janice Zagardo vs Nancy Snook / Susan Tretter7-5, 0-1
2023-04-17vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-PekinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDena Keenan / Rebecca Sandborg vs Joann Blair / Cay Ernst6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesErin Murray vs Allison Cooper4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Wombacher / Susan Davis vs Diane Donnelly / Sue Chelikas6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanice Zagardo / Laura Kolb vs Kris Wertz / Shari Windsor3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · West MSIL A18 & Over 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL A18&O 3.5W Murray-Peoria51141022211
2MSIL A18&O 3.5W McHenry-Bloomington24131128215
3MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-Pekin2491534230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Amalia Krecik
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Amanda Lawler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Erica Ray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Dena Keenan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Rebecca Sandborg
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Janice Zagardo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Patricia Wombacher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Letitia Spirek-Algrain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Erin Murray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Brittany Henrich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Laura Kolb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Janice Zagardo6650% games+2.6% vs expected
Laura Kolb + Janice Zagardo1738% games+2.1% vs expected
Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Erin Murray5154% games+1.8% vs expected
Dena Keenan + Letitia Spirek-Algrain3645% games−11.5% vs expected
Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Patricia Wombacher4256% gamesnot enough data
Erica Ray + Janice Zagardo3253% gamesnot enough data
Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Erica Ray404 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Wombacher + Janice Zagardo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amalia Krecik
58W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Amanda Lawler
70W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Erica Ray
54W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Dena Keenan
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Sandborg
42W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Janice Zagardo
68W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Patricia Wombacher
49W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Letitia Spirek-Algrain
44W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
3.5
Erin Murray
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Brittany Henrich
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Kolb
14W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.