Teams

Flint River/Kim Thriffiley

2022 Flint River USTA MXD 18 & Over - Summer · MXD 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-09vs Shiver/CamillaLost 02
L#2 DoublesScott Forsyth / Rhonda Tullos vs Brian Bellamy / Erica Hilliard6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKim Thriffiley / John Taylor vs Coy Chambers / Nikki Hall6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-30vs Heard/BainbridgeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Thriffiley / George Thomas Harrison vs Karan Barber / Jordan Griffin7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Dale Wing vs Bob Nunnery / Rhonda Wells6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesScott Forsyth / Rhonda Tullos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-11vs Heard/BainbridgeWon 20
W#2 DoublesGeorge Thomas Harrison / Lisa Franson vs Rhonda Wells / Jordan Griffin7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Dale Wing vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-09vs Shiver/CamillaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Dale Wing vs Erica Hilliard / Matthew Hilliard1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGeorge Thomas Harrison / Lisa Franson vs Nikki Hall / Austin York6-1, 6-1
2022-05-22vs Shiver/CamillaWon 20
W#2 DoublesGeorge Thomas Harrison / Michelle Eubanks vs Brian Bellamy / Victoria Bellamy6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDale Wing / Rhonda Tullos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-19vs Heard/BainbridgeWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatrina Walton / George Thomas Harrison vs Stephen Mayfield / Beth Briggs6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Taylor / Rhonda Tullos vs Glenn Heard / Rhonda Wells6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MXD 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Dale Wing
published 4
3.78
George Thomas Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Michelle Eubanks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.59
Rhonda Tullos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Kim Thriffiley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Thriffiley + Rhonda Tullos31437% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Rhonda Tullos5259% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Kim Thriffiley2351% gamesnot enough data
George Thomas Harrison + Kim Thriffiley2348% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Franson + Kim Thriffiley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Wing
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
George Thomas Harrison
65W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Lisa Franson
31W–24L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Rhonda Tullos
237W–248L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 3 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.