Teams

BOYLE PK S70W8.0A

2025 ADULT 70&Over · Women 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesCandace Davenport / Ellen Carlton vs Terry Babcock / Hilda Fischer0-1
W#1 DoublesLyn Little / Catherine Kennedy vs Camilla Sutherland / Sandra Miller6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEllen Carlton / Candace Davenport vs Joan Avedian / Terry Babcock6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Billecci / Sandy Lim vs Irene Harris / Hilda Fischer2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCatherine Billecci / Sandy Lim vs Joan Avedian / Hilda Fischer4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Kennedy / Lyn Little vs Irene Harris / Bette Sanchez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCandace Davenport / Ellen Carlton vs Carole Heinrichs / Marilyn Watts6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Catherine Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Suzanne Seavey
published
Ellen Carlton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Candace Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Catherine Billecci
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Lyn Little
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Lim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyn Little + Catherine Kennedy10073% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Billecci + Sandy Lim1536% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Carlton + Candace Davenport213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Kennedy
14W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Suzanne Seavey
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Ellen Carlton
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Candace Davenport
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Catherine Billecci
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Lyn Little
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Lim
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.