Teams

KC-RH GOLD

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs LTC-M REDSplit 11
L#2 SinglesDavid Maas vs Nicholas Kreczko5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Arend / Shane Svitak vs Zack Berry / John Guillod6-4, 6-4
2024-05-22vs MC REDLost 01
L#2 SinglesGreg Arend vs Michael Boord4-6, 3-6
2024-05-15vs NJ REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Chapel / David Maas vs Dave Kranzler / Mark Bauerle4-6, 4-6
2024-05-11vs KC-RH BRONZESplit 11
L#1 SinglesDavid Maas vs Mark Kalkus2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Arend / Jeffrey Jones vs William Ross / Victor Nehf6-4, 7-5
2024-05-08vs MVCC REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesGreg Arend vs Travis Ervick5-7, 2-6
2024-04-24vs NJ BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesGreg Arend vs Alan Shkolnikov6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHector Lopez / David Maas vs Claus Andersen / Greg Fisher6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-17vs RHCC BLUEWon 10
W#2 SinglesDavid Maas vs John Pugh6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Greg Arend
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Jeremy Yeiter
published
3.69
Ken Reed
published
3.60
David Maas
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Shane Svitak
published
3.48
Hector Lopez
published
3.45
John Bohan
published
3.41
Ron Lamberson
published
3.35
Jim Chapel
published
2.73
John Jansons
published 3
Heath Lynch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Jansons + Ken Reed1450% gamesnot enough data
John Jansons + David Maas224 matchesnot enough data
Jim Chapel + David Maas044 matchesnot enough data
Greg Arend + Ken Reed134 matchesnot enough data
John Jansons + Greg Arend213 matchesnot enough data
John Bohan + Hector Lopez033 matchesnot enough data
Shane Svitak + Ken Reed033 matchesnot enough data
Greg Arend + Ron Lamberson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Arend
72W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Jeremy Yeiter
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Ken Reed
21W–36L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
David Maas
41W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Shane Svitak
0W–10L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Hector Lopez
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
John Bohan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Ron Lamberson
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Jim Chapel
2W–20L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.35
3
John Jansons
37W–64L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Heath Lynch
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.