Teams

Refund/Credit

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · Refund

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Caroline Dunlop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
3.55
Amanda Lovejoy
published 4
3.55
Marisa Epstein
published
3.48
3.45
Vivian Portillo
published
3.42
Jennifer Soliman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Patty Martin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.18
Cathy Sheer
published 3.5
2.90
Mila Burns
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Cathy Kadets
published 3
2.69
Nancy Aranow
published 3
Fiona Strachan
published
Jane Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Martin + Jane Kim3446% games−9.3% vs expected
Patty Martin + Amanda Lovejoy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caroline Dunlop
113W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Rebecca le Neve Foster
104W–24L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Amanda Lovejoy
27W–68L career · type A · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Marisa Epstein
42W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Melissa Calandruccio
7W–28L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Vivian Portillo
95W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Jennifer Soliman
66W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Patty Martin
48W–102L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Cathy Sheer
34W–41L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Mila Burns
44W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Cathy Kadets
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Nancy Aranow
66W–138L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Fiona Strachan
84W–68L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jane Kim
143W–77L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.