Teams

GAC (Joi Fairell)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-06-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMelea Connett / Jennifer Tiberia vs Katie Mays / Jennifer Massie0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
2.88
Dana Copeland
published 3
2.80
Jennifer Tiberia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
2.71
Joi Fairell
published
2.69
Danielle Erskine
published 3
2.57
Ashley Jordan
published 2.5
2.52
Tammy Stephens
published
2.49
Joanne Harris
published
2.49
Addelynn Linton
published 3
2.47
Alex Ogletree
published 3
2.41
Debbie Butler
published 2.5
2.36
Alexandra Davie
published 2.5
2.12
Jasmine Houston
published
Shelley Koch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joi Fairell + Alex Ogletree2443% games−3.7% vs expected
Joanne Harris + Tammy Stephens1440% gamesnot enough data
Joi Fairell + Annabelle Townsend224 matchesnot enough data
Annabelle Townsend + Alexandra Davie404 matchesnot enough data
Annabelle Townsend + Danielle Erskine134 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Harris + Annabelle Townsend123 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Harris + Debbie Butler123 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Harris + Alexandra Davie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beverley Dockeray Ojo
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Dana Copeland
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Jennifer Tiberia
5W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Annabelle Townsend
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Joi Fairell
26W–27L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Danielle Erskine
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Ashley Jordan
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Tammy Stephens
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Joanne Harris
11W–31L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Addelynn Linton
9W–23L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Alex Ogletree
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Debbie Butler
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
Alexandra Davie
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Crystal Joseph-Smith
0W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jasmine Houston
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Koch
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.