Teams

Johnson, Christopher

2026 HOA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs Curley, MichaelWon 21
W#1 DoublesWes Mikel / Seth Smith vs Michael Nguyen / Nathan Ahuna6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBrian Gregory vs Clay UHRMACHER0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJacob Schreiber / Christopher Johnson vs Shashi Gannavaram / Alan Bowes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-07vs Bohning, BrandonLost 13
W#1 DoublesWes Mikel / Seth Smith vs Brandon Bohning / Chandler Poore7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrew Price vs Juan Carlos Baldelomar0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKent Williams / Kowin Casey vs Jason Wartman / Michael Hughes2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Schermoly / Jeff Ogg vs Jonathan Herbeck / Tom Rosewicz7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-28vs Locke, AaronWon 21
W#1 DoublesSeth Smith / Wes Mikel vs Will Goertzen / Alexey Milakhin5-7, 5-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Schermoly / Dan David vs David Theilen / Nicholas McKay5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKowin Casey / Kent Williams vs Juan C Ramirez-Mares / Andrew Woody6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Pattabiraman, KarthickWon 21
W#1 DoublesSeth Smith / Wes Mikel vs Erik Gasparovich / Brett Saunders6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKent Williams / Kowin Casey vs Ryan Kimbrell / Eric Maginness6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Schermoly / Christopher Johnson vs RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU / Ranjit Ramdas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-21vs Fabrizius, SteveLost 03
L#1 DoublesDan David / Seth Smith vs Josh Klingler / Andy Bonner1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJacob Schreiber / Christopher Johnson vs Eric Wimmer / Andrew Wimmer6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKent Williams / Kowin Casey vs Robert Beltrame / Bill Roller1-6, 3-6
2026-02-14vs Granger, NathanWon 40
W#1 DoublesWes Mikel / Seth Smith vs Troy Thomasson / Nathan Granger6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrian Gregory vs Jeff Eskew6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Ogg / Jacob Schreiber vs Robert Humble / Chan Kim6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Johnson / Andrew Price vs ANDRE CURIEL / Sean Kalic7-6, 6-4
2026-01-31vs Bicknell, BradSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSeth Smith / Michael Schermoly vs Robert Madison / Steven Schanker6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrian Gregory vs Brian Dennis1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWes Mikel / Jacob Schreiber vs Jeff Stockham / Jim Hawkins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Johnson / Andrew Price vs Paul Watkins / John Nestor2-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs HOA/Burgess-Zingg/40&over3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichael Schermoly / Jacob Schreiber vs Richard Bierman / David Merritt2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Gregory vs Robert Halksworth2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKent Williams / Wes Mikel vs Jerry Martin / Ram Chettiar3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKowin Casey / Seth Smith vs John Jacobs / Bryan Zingg5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Seth Smith
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.18
Jacob Schreiber
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Dan David
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Brian Gregory
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kent Williams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Wes Mikel
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
Michael Schermoly
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Andrew Price
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Kowin Casey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Jeff Ogg
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Dan LeRoy
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Smith + Wes Mikel5069% gamesnot enough data
Kowin Casey + Kent Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Ogg + Wes Mikel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seth Smith
17W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Jacob Schreiber
52W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dan David
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Brian Gregory
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kent Williams
62W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Wes Mikel
34W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Michael Schermoly
4W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Andrew Price
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Kowin Casey
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
Jeff Ogg
11W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Dan LeRoy
7W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.