Teams

Long/O'Neill

2024 Talbot Combo · Talbot Combo 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-29vs JacobsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Chambers / Karen McLaughlin vs Meagan Flohr / Abby Jacobson6-7, 5-7
2024-10-15vs JacobsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesGina Dubbe / Marie Paris vs Heidi Wright / Meagan Flohr2-6, 1-6
2024-10-08vs JacobsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarie Paris / Elizabeth Hamilton vs KAREN TENGWALL / Anne-Marie Walters6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Clark / Kerry O'Neill vs Liz Connelly / Karen Wiley Alt6-1, 7-5
2024-10-07vs JacobsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesTrudy Abbott / Mary Chambers vs Elizabeth Jacobson / Beth Berquist6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Paris / Elizabeth Hamilton vs Gigi Hershey / Lisa Sargeant6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Cook / Jane Cross vs Abby Jacobson / Liz Connelly6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-07vs JacobsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesMegan Cook / Jenny Dillon vs Gigi Hershey / Heidi Wright1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Paris / Christina Friedli vs Leigh Deeter / Meagan Flohr4-6, 3-6
2024-10-01vs JacobsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarie Paris / Gina Dubbe vs Liz Connelly / Abby Jacobson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-10vs JacobsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrudy Abbott / Lellie Keating vs Gigi Hershey / Shelley Sturtz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Cook / Kerry O'Neill vs Leigh Deeter / Anne-Marie Walters6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarie Paris / Erika Long vs KAREN TENGWALL / Karen Wiley Alt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Talbot Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Elizabeth Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Kerry O'Neill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Gina Dubbe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christina Friedli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jenny Dillon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lellie Keating
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Paris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Cook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Trudy Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Hamilton + Kerry O'Neill033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Hamilton
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Kerry O'Neill
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Gina Dubbe
61W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Christina Friedli
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jenny Dillon
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Karen McLaughlin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lellie Keating
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marie Paris
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Cook
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trudy Abbott
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.