Teams

BC-AltaVista/TeresaCampbell

2022 Mixed 55 & Over - SEASON TWO - BC LOCAL LEAGUE · BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-19vs BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Rosiak / Michelle Alford vs Lisa Kusayanagi / Rick Orandle0-6, 0-6
2022-06-12vs BC-PVTC/NikkiNanceWon 20
W#1 DoublesTess Pugliese / Steven Kigawa vs Lisa Lee / Mark T Thompson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLoc NGUYEN / Michelle Alford vs Jonathan Lane / Catherine Bergland7-5, 6-1
2022-05-29vs BC-SealBeachTC/KenYipLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Kigawa / Elizabeth Carter vs Steve Oetomo / Celia Dominguez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs BC-LLWS-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteven Kigawa / Heidi Grimm vs Eric VanderPloeg / Gail Schirm4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Milroy / Loc NGUYEN vs Nigel Witham / Kathleen Callahan6-1, 7-6
2022-05-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Kigawa / Tess Pugliese vs Mark T Thompson / Vicki Thorrens0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-01vs BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Alford / Nicholas Douglas vs Lisa Kusayanagi / Rick Orandle3-6, 0-6
2022-04-23vs BC-SealBeachTC/KenYipWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Vaughn / Tess Pugliese vs Eric Campos / Nachi Smith6-2, 6-3
2022-04-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPamela Milroy / Dennis Fernandes vs Victoria Wright / Howard Kim4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Pamela Milroy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
3.73
Teresa Campbell
published
Heidi Grimm
published 3.5
Michelle Alford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nicholas Douglas
published
Steven Kigawa
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tess Pugliese
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Kigawa + Tess Pugliese5159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Pamela Milroy
112W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Teresa Campbell
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Heidi Grimm
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Alford
69W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicholas Douglas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Kigawa
76W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tess Pugliese
46W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.