Teams

SFV Valley Girlfriends

2022 Adult 55 & Over - SFV · SFV 55 & Over - Women 6.0

5 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesBarb Jepson / Ellen Swagerty vs TANIA JANICEK / Leslie Giammanco6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-20vs SFV Match PointSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer House / Barb Jepson vs Pam Eyer / Patricia Eyraud1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Gladys Gravelis / Veronica Thorpe6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Miriam Golbert / Jenny Killgore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarb Jepson / Ellen Swagerty vs TANIA JANICEK / Linda Palacios4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-06vs SFV Match PointLost 02
L#2 DoublesBarb Jepson / Rhonda Mosser vs Pam Eyer / Veronica Thorpe4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Linda Egan vs Gladys Gravelis / Diane Colangelo2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-30vs SFV RacketeersWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarb Jepson / Kathryn Pisaro vs Robina Markarian / Zenaida Siojo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGizelda Parr / Linda Egan vs TANIA JANICEK / Leslie Giammanco1-6, 0-2
L#2 DoublesBarb Jepson / Ellen Swagerty vs Janine Baker / ZELMA HIGGS3-6, 1-6
2022-07-10vs SFV RacketeersWon 20
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Bonnie Freeman / Rosine Simitian6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGizelda Parr / Catherine Haywood vs Liberty Peralta / Aidzz Ticsay6-1, 7-6
2022-06-04vs SFV RacketeersWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarb Jepson / Jennifer House vs Margie Englis / Grace Spencer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Letty King / Stephanie Johnson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Rhonda Mosser
published
2.80
Ellen Swagerty
published 3
2.79
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Barb Jepson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.45
Gizelda Parr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barb Jepson + Gizelda Parr7652% games+4.2% vs expected
Kathryn Pisaro + Barb Jepson4745% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Pisaro + Gizelda Parr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Mosser
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Barb Jepson
70W–61L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Gizelda Parr
44W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.