Teams

Bailey Ballers

Mixed Up Dubs · 3.5 Mixed Up Dubs Social League

10 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-24vs Mixed up funSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesAnn Modlin / Alli Boehm vs Christine Bogojevich / Kathleen Rissberger2-6, 2-6
W#1 Mixed DoublesWade Nyquist / Heidi Nyquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-10vs Good GuysSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesChristine Tattersfield / Jana Ritter vs Mali Robinson / Sherilyn Dlugolenski6-1, 6-1
L#1 Male DoublesJeff Reiner / Jon Baugues vs James Laurenson / Scott Robinson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-03vs Mixed up funSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesChristine Tattersfield / Jana Ritter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 Mixed DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Wade Nyquist vs Sherry Lerme / Andrew Howland1-6, 5-7
2025-09-19vs Good GuysLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesBeth Packard / Alli Boehm vs Sherilyn Dlugolenski / Mali Robinson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-12vs Mixed up funSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesAnn Modlin / Heather MacFadyen vs Karla Williams / Cindy Japec4-6, 3-6
W#1 Mixed DoublesCaleb OBriant / Heidi Nyquist vs Kathy Buaron / Julius Fernandez0-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed Up Dubs Social League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jana Ritter
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Christine Tattersfield
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Ann Modlin
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Stephanie Adili
published
3.25
Caleb OBriant
published 3.5
3.21
Heidi Nyquist
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Heather MacFadyen
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Jeff Reiner
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Beth Packard
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Alli Boehm
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jana Ritter
109W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.60
3.5
Christine Tattersfield
117W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ann Modlin
80W–135L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Stephanie Adili
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Caleb OBriant
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Heidi Nyquist
129W–151L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Heather MacFadyen
118W–128L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Jeff Reiner
79W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Beth Packard
77W–149L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Alli Boehm
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.