Teams

GR Taylor 55 7.5

2025 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#3 DoublesSusan Johnson / Whitney Musgrave vs Marsha Pierson / Tracy Wilkinson5-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesRuth Thorne / Cynthia Jones vs Marie Tingle / Debra Johann7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Paige Temple vs Denise Wells / Lynn Easley4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Land / Terry Ray vs Kim Alford / Sandy Phillips7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Susan Johnson vs Marie Tingle / Mariana Goldstein6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCynthia Jones / Paige Temple vs Lynn Easley / Denise Wells3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTerry Ray / Catherine Land vs Kim Alford / Sandy Phillips2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesCynthia Jones / Ruth Thorne vs Denise Wells / Sandy Phillips6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIna Jones / Paige Temple vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Mariana Goldstein0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-17vs OP-Alfiord Lucky Ladies (55s 7.5W C)Split 11
W#1 DoublesIna Jones / Susan Johnson vs Lynn Easley / Debra Johann6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCarol Taylor / Ruth Thorne vs Marie Tingle / Sandy Phillips6-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Ruth Thorne vs Sandy Phillips / Kim Alford6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Land / Paige Temple vs Ruby Williams / Tracy Wilkinson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSherry Smith / Terry Ray vs Debra Johann / Marsha Pierson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55s 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Jones
published 4
3.73
Ina Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Sheryletta Lacewell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Carol Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Terry Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Whitney Musgrave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Paige Temple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Musgrave + Paige Temple4152% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Jones
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ina Jones
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Sheryletta Lacewell
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
4
Carol Taylor
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Terry Ray
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Whitney Musgrave
40W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Paige Temple
26W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Ruth Thorne
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.