Teams

Selma - Skier

2025 · 2026 Fall ESL - Adult 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 Fall ESL - Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Elizabeth Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.96
Elinor Skier
published 4
3.83
Holly Adcock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.79
Natali Wiedemann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.74
Mary Ashlyn Pearce
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.74
Darlene Skier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Leslie Calloway
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
3.70
DANITA ALLEN
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.53
Vanessa Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Ellen Sharan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Lauren Reasner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Sharan + Darlene Skier8655% games+12.3% vs expected
Vanessa Brown + Leslie Calloway5448% games−0.3% vs expected
Natali Wiedemann + Holly Adcock4164% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Brown + Natali Wiedemann123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Reasner + Elizabeth Cobb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Cobb
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.98
4
Elinor Skier
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Holly Adcock
22W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Natali Wiedemann
20W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Mary Ashlyn Pearce
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Darlene Skier
25W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Leslie Calloway
50W–24L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.72
4
DANITA ALLEN
24W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Vanessa Brown
13W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Ellen Sharan
25W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Lauren Reasner
26W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.