Teams

Stordahl 40 Something

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-26vs LeDoux/Brown Winter 2025Lost 23
L#1 DoublesKathy Cima / Molly Dymit vs Barb Brown / Lisa Stockmo0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Sapan vs Ingrid Klein6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Knutson / Jacqueline Williams vs Beth Arel / Kathryn Schneider2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Buckman / Sandra Moore vs Kathy Jungquist / Heather Legris3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesDunja Sher / Yelena Yan vs Lisa Schroeder / Jacie Hurd4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jacqueline Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aimee Speier
published 3.5
3.21
Shannon Overdahl
published
3.17
Alexandra Sapan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Jill Sisk
published
3.12
Courtney Knutson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Molly Dymit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kathy Cima
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Dunja Sher
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Pamela Snyder
published
2.80
Yelena Yan
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Kelly Stordahl
published
Kathy Buckman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Dymit + Shannon Overdahl3649% games+6.2% vs expected
Yelena Yan + Dunja Sher3448% games−0.4% vs expected
Jacqueline Williams + Courtney Knutson51443% games−0.8% vs expected
Shannon Overdahl + Kathy Cima3942% games−3.9% vs expected
Molly Dymit + Kathy Cima81438% games−7.2% vs expected
Jill Sisk + Jacqueline Williams044 matchesnot enough data
Molly Dymit + Jill Sisk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Williams
31W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Aimee Speier
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Overdahl
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Alexandra Sapan
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
Jill Sisk
22W–28L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Courtney Knutson
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Molly Dymit
16W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Kathy Cima
17W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Pamela Snyder
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Heidi Kapacinskas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Stordahl
10W–39L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.28
Kathy Buckman
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.