Teams

HMTC

2022 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-16vs LVTASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKeith Babcock / Kendal Sanders vs Jeff Fugate / Cory Lynch6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Morrison / Arte Libunao vs Greg Jette / Alan Krech2-6, 0-6
2022-04-09vs FCCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeith Babcock / Mark Sundstedt vs Sean Tomlinson / Joseph Lillis3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKendal Sanders vs Alex Pecilunas3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Morrison / Arte Libunao vs Josh Shelby / Thomas Shanley2-6, 6-7
2022-04-02vs LVTAWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeith Babcock / Mark Sundstedt vs Jeff Fugate / Greg Jette6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Robeson vs Patrick OShea4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJon Leydens / Arte Libunao vs Alan Krech / Cory Lynch6-2, 6-2
2022-03-19vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Sundstedt / Jon Leydens vs Josh Shelby / David van Thuyne2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKendal Sanders vs Alex Pecilunas2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKeith Babcock / James Morrison vs Paul Gronewoller / Matthew Hoeven6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mark Sundstedt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Kendal Sanders
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
James Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Arte Libunao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Gary Westlind
published 3.5
Jon Leydens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Robeson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Babcock + Mark Sundstedt2439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Sundstedt
25W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kendal Sanders
57W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
James Morrison
44W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Arte Libunao
12W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gary Westlind
15W–62L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jon Leydens
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Babcock
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Robeson
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.