Teams

KLee/SChandra (Charlotte Tennis NC)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-30vs SGrindle (Weddington)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Lauren Olson vs Gabriela ROY / Sandra Torres5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVicki Greenway / Beth Parker vs Nancy Klug / Sally Blocksom1-6, 2-6
2025-09-23vs KCronin/Ferguson (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Parker / Melodie Ohaus vs Tyler Brody / Stacey Whitney0-6, 2-6
2025-09-16vs RRiechelmann/HCasey (WSRC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Shruti Chandra vs Heidi Casey / Mary Collins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVicki Greenway / Marjorie Wagner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-09vs PPhelan/MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVicki Greenway / Kristi Lee vs Bardeen Forman / Patricia Phelan6-7, 1-6
2025-09-02vs BLothe (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristi Lee / Vicki Greenway vs Virginia Borkey / Karen Summers6-2, 6-1
2025-08-25vs THyso (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Parker / Melodie Ohaus vs Heather Tselentis / Kris Jones2-6, 2-6
2025-08-20vs LAndersen (Shannamara)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLauren Olson / Melodie Ohaus vs Yukiko Cooper / Teri Snoke1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesVicki Greenway / Beth Parker vs Stephanie Gossert / Mary McGarvey1-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs SNakai (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Shruti Chandra vs Rosalie ORourke / Jena Barton3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Marjorie Wagner
published
2.66
Shruti Chandra
published
2.62
Vicki Greenway
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.47
Laura Seth
published
Jeannine Mortenson
published
Kristi Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shruti Chandra + Vicki Greenway3347% games+0.8% vs expected
Melodie Ohaus + Vicki Greenway1440% games−11.0% vs expected
Marjorie Wagner + Laura Seth0539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Marjorie Wagner
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Shruti Chandra
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
3
Vicki Greenway
34W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Laura Seth
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Jeannine Mortenson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Lee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.