Teams

HCC Platinum Plus

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.45 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Each Hit 55+73191126240
2Midcourt Crisis73161431272
3HCC Platinum Plus64201023214
455 Shades of Grey46151536293
5Still Smashed46131741298
6Live, Lob, Laugh46121842297
7Nothing But Love 55+2872351330

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Chandra Zenner-Ford
published 3.5
3.41
Christin Steele
published 3.5
3.39
Cathy Wood
published 3.5
3.35
Trudy Fouser
published 3.5
3.27
Kimberly Shansby
published 3.5
3.16
Susi Keeth
published 3.5
3.12
Leslie Michael
published 3.5
3.11
Shawna Ianson
published 3.5
3.08
Roxy Therrien
published 3.5
3.00
Vicki Flume
published 3.5
2.92
Alaina Sayers
published 3
Kathy O'Neill
published
Kelli Fredback
published
Lori Barnum
published
Sherri Matney
published
Tina Michael
published
Valerie Brauner
published
Vicki Goss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roxy Therrien + Susi Keeth7652% games+8.9% vs expected
Susi Keeth + Shawna Ianson8757% games+2.0% vs expected
Trudy Fouser + Susi Keeth9162% games−1.7% vs expected
Shawna Ianson + Vicki Flume8754% games−2.9% vs expected
Roxy Therrien + Vicki Flume111350% games−3.2% vs expected
Trudy Fouser + Shawna Ianson4347% games−3.5% vs expected
Susi Keeth + Vicki Flume111046% games−6.9% vs expected
Trudy Fouser + Vicki Flume4749% games−10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chandra Zenner-Ford
39W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Christin Steele
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Cathy Wood
93W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Trudy Fouser
60W–75L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Kimberly Shansby
120W–83L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Susi Keeth
55W–33L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Leslie Michael
43W–72L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Shawna Ianson
92W–114L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Roxy Therrien
63W–80L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3.5
Vicki Flume
58W–83L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Alaina Sayers
149W–166L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Kathy O'Neill
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Fredback
14W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Barnum
23W–48L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherri Matney
25W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Michael
33W–60L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Brauner
5W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Goss
34W–49L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.