Teams

CLC:Backswings:Jackson

2021 ME Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-28vs RFC:SweatLikeAMother:ChappellLost 12
W#1 DoublesAdele Gale / Marilee Harris vs Eliza Chappell / Sara Woodman6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShelley Pease vs Sarah Parisien2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Welles / Pixie Lauer vs Tricia Thompson / Lela Williams3-6, 3-6
2021-03-13vs RFC:SwitchSisters:TalbotWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdele Gale / Marilee Harris vs Annie Houston / Kimberly Kelly-Brewster7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnnette Welles vs Lori Bianchi6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesColeen Trask / Shelley Pease vs Wendy Cannon / Tonya Holt0-6, 6-7
2021-03-13vs WOOD:Harvey'sAngels:BryantLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarilee Harris / Wendy Jackson vs Karen Fendler / Virgilia Bryant2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShelley Pease vs Diane Dow3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPixie Lauer / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Sandra Couch Kelly / Sorca Sherman6-1, 6-0
2021-02-28vs RFC:SwitchSisters:TalbotLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Welles / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Annie Houston / Krystal Talbot0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShelley Pease vs Kimberly Nappi0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarilee Harris / Adele Gale vs Ruth Matt / Patricia Martel-Buxton4-6, 3-6
2021-02-28vs RFC:SweatLikeAMother:ChappellSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarilee Harris / Adele Gale vs Eliza Chappell / Tricia Thompson6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAnnette Welles vs Kristie Green6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShelley Pease / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Cindy Rowland / Kristalyn Keenan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Jackson / Pixie Lauer vs Amy Therrien / Sara Woodman5-7, 4-6
2021-02-14vs WOOD:Harvey'sAngels:BryantLost 13
L#1 DoublesAdele Gale / Wendy Jackson vs Linda Rathbun / Joanna Pond0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnnette Welles vs Karen Fendler1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatti Corscaden / Coleen Trask vs Virgilia Bryant / Deb Pert4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPixie Lauer / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Kelly Rodgers / Marsha Traill6-4, 7-6
2021-02-14vs RFC:SweatLikeAMother:ChappellLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnette Welles / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Eliza Chappell / Cindy Rowland7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAdele Gale vs Kristie Green3-6, 3-6
2021-01-31vs WOOD:Harvey'sAngels:BryantSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWendy Jackson / Adele Gale vs Deb Pert / Rita Farry6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShelley Pease vs Diane Dow2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesColeen Trask / Patti Corscaden vs Kimberly Oconnell / Virgilia Bryant1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPixie Lauer / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Lisa Kendrick / Marsha Traill2-6, 2-6
2021-01-16vs RFC:SwitchSisters:TalbotLost 13
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Glendinning / Shelley Pease vs Annie Houston / Kimberly Kelly-Brewster2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnnette Welles vs Lori Bianchi6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesColeen Trask / Jean Thompson McKinley vs Ruth Crosby / Julie Faure6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPixie Lauer / Wendy Jackson vs Elizabeth Langham / Wendy Cannon3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:SwitchSisters:Talbot81261025266
2WOOD:Harvey'sAngels:Bryant63191742320
3CLC:Backswings:Jackson36132350347
4RFC:SweatLikeAMother:Chappell18142250359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Annette Welles
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.19
Marilee Harris
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.03
Adele Gale
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.60
Coleen Trask
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Pixie Lauer
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.42
Shelley Pease
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adele Gale + Marilee Harris7548% games−7.1% vs expected
Coleen Trask + Pixie Lauer303 matchesnot enough data
Coleen Trask + Marilee Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annette Welles
132W–80L career · 15 lines in 2021
<1%22%78%
3.60
Marilee Harris
75W–92L career · 13 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Adele Gale
49W–55L career · 13 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Coleen Trask
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
Pixie Lauer
22W–29L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%58%42%
2.47
Shelley Pease
18W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.