Teams

BC-PalosVerdesTC/JeromeHaig

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-11vs BC-Kramer/JoePiccirilloWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Chekian / Kurt Kredel vs Brian Beach / Matt Gilman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-12-04vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 10
W#1 DoublesKurt Kredel / Andrew Chekian vs Tom Hindman / Bruce Logan6-0, 6-3
2021-11-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesKurt Kredel / Andrew Chekian vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJerome Haig / Robert Mullarkey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-13vs BC-WestEnd/TienTrinhLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Mullarkey / Jerry Keating vs Richard Martin / Tung Le0-6, 0-6
2021-11-06vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/KeithOshiroLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Chekian / Kurt Kredel vs Phil Chidester / Daniel Hying2-6, 3-6
2021-10-30vs BC-MCC/EricSmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Chekian / Kurt Kredel vs Tim Crawmer / Andrew Radden6-7, 2-6
2021-10-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRoland Rietz / Robert Mullarkey vs Scott Nishimura / Masaki Sumimoto1-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Mullarkey / Dean Seislove vs Gordon Davis / Bob Parsi1-6, 5-7
2021-09-25vs BC-IndpendencePark/RafaelHerreraWon 10
W#1 DoublesKurt Kredel / Andrew Chekian vs Ismael Soria / Ernesto MacIas7-6, 6-3
2021-09-18vs BC-WestEnd/TienTrinhWon 10
W#1 DoublesKurt Kredel / Andrew Chekian vs Tae Gim / Koichi Ishihara6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Andrew Chekian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Joshua Chou
published
4.20
Kurt Kredel
published
3.91
Jason Cohen
published
3.84
Peter Malishka
published
3.42
Robert Mullarkey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Dean Seislove
published 3.5
Jason Sikola
published
Jay Gardner
published
Jerome Haig
published
Roland Rietz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Chekian + Kurt Kredel21853% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Chekian
111W–64L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
4.33
Joshua Chou
14W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
Kurt Kredel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
Jason Cohen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
3.91
Peter Malishka
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
Robert Mullarkey
48W–59L career · 10 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Dean Seislove
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Sikola
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jay Gardner
2W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jerome Haig
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roland Rietz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.