Teams

Spring refunds submitted

2024 Z-Refunded Players · Adult Leagues

29 players · average NTRP 3.41 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Leagues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 25 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Angie Tyner
published 4.5
3.94
Dee Pitawanakwat
published 4
3.92
Ginger Murdoch
published
3.86
Tim Whitehorn
published
3.74
Deana Templeton
published 4
3.71
Margo Gruen
published
3.65
Terry Bartley
published
3.40
Lindsay Adams
published
3.38
Heidi Wharton
published
3.36
Maryann Shilling
published
3.34
Jay Knight
published
3.34
Cristi Ross
published 3.5
3.33
David van Horn
published 3.5
3.31
Jitana Bagomolny
published
Bala Balakrishna
published 3.5
3.20
Judy Butterfield
published
3.18
Connie Lester
published 3.5
3.15
Virginia Palacio
published
3.01
James Ensell
published
2.78
Mina Chung
published
2.78
Leslie Walsh
published
2.75
Deepa Nair
published 3
Beverly Baur
published 3
2.73
Mariangeles Grear
published
2.61
Rebecca Slater
published
2.57
Rachel Burford
published
2.44
Allison Drane
published 2.5
Ann Pretzer
published 2.5
Monika Nenon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margo Gruen + Deana Templeton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Tyner
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Dee Pitawanakwat
42W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Ginger Murdoch
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.92
Tim Whitehorn
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Deana Templeton
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Margo Gruen
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Terry Bartley
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.65
Lindsay Adams
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Heidi Wharton
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Maryann Shilling
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Jay Knight
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Cristi Ross
26W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
David van Horn
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Jitana Bagomolny
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Bala Balakrishna
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Judy Butterfield
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Connie Lester
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Virginia Palacio
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
James Ensell
32W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mina Chung
7W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Leslie Walsh
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Deepa Nair
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Beverly Baur
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mariangeles Grear
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Rebecca Slater
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
Rachel Burford
26W–26L career · no lines in 2024
0%31%69%
2.57
2.5
Allison Drane
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Ann Pretzer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monika Nenon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.