Teams

Williams Y - Raithel

2022 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-18Won 10
W#2 SinglesCort Raithel vs Thiagu Rajendran5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-16vs AldenLost 01
L#1 DoublesCort Raithel / Jason Collins vs Tim Fritz / Allen Foley0-6, 3-6
2022-06-11vs DUVAL/PobstLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Collins / Cort Raithel vs Scott Haines / Douglas Robison3-6, 2-6
2022-06-04vs Huguenot - RadelLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Collins / Cort Raithel vs Eric van Westering / Danny Holland4-6, 1-6
2022-05-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesJason Collins / Cort Raithel vs Matt Forhan / Earl Yates III6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-07vs DUVAL/Boehm - San JoseLost 01
L#1 DoublesCort Raithel / Jason Collins vs Eduardo Andrade / Lou Body3-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs Eagle Harbor - SappWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Collins / Cort Raithel vs Matt Hutto / Dan Singleton6-3, 6-4
2022-04-16vs Julington Creek - BassWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Collins / Cort Raithel vs Michael Pandolfi / Joao Sarpi6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-09vs FYC - TravisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Collins / Cort Raithel vs BRYAN Clontz / Charles Conway6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Harrell Robinson
published 4.5
3.83
Cort Raithel
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.83
Brian Zurawel
published 4
3.78
Stuart McNally
published
Colson Mcgehee
published 4
Felix Nazareno
published 4
3.62
Herve Devos
published 4
3.40
Andy Fricke
published 3.5
John Setzler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuart McNally + Cort Raithel123 matchesnot enough data
Cort Raithel + Andy Fricke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Harrell Robinson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
4.14
4
Cort Raithel
173W–130L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Brian Zurawel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Stuart McNally
25W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Colson Mcgehee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Felix Nazareno
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Herve Devos
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Andy Fricke
106W–71L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
John Setzler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.