Teams

Boyd/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Elsea/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDori Waller / Tatiana Dyskina vs Silang Sam / Angela Poffenbaugh6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAbbigail Henry vs Jaime Shelton6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKarey Haisten Matlock / Megan Billingsley vs Natalie Martin / Jessica Warnock6-4, 7-6
2026-05-12vs Elsea/ChattanoogaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJill Levine / Dori Waller vs Silang Sam / Angela Poffenbaugh5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAbbigail Henry vs Neha Patel6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSathya Sanipina / Ashley Watkins vs Jessica Warnock / Catherine Stracker3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTatiana Dyskina / Karey Haisten Matlock vs Emily Lilley / Anna Straussberger6-4, 6-4
2026-05-03vs Elsea/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Billingsley / Ashley Watkins vs Silang Sam / Jaime Shelton6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAbbigail Henry vs Natalie Martin6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKarey Haisten Matlock / Caroline Martin vs Tia Lopez / Angela Poffenbaugh6-0, 6-4
2026-04-12vs Elsea/ChattanoogaWon 31
W#1 DoublesMisty Brennan / Ashley Watkins vs Catherine Stracker / Neha Patel7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAbbigail Henry vs Daria Sharova6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Levine / Caroline Martin vs Jaime Shelton / Silang Sam7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeanne Morrow / Megan Billingsley vs Emily Lilley / Lillian Belford6-0, 6-4
2026-04-04vs Elsea/ChattanoogaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeanne Morrow / Morgan Edwards vs Anna Straussberger / Catherine Stracker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAbbigail Henry vs Jaime Shelton6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKarey Haisten Matlock / Sathya Sanipina vs Michelle Vazquez / Neha Patel6-3, 4-5
L#3 DoublesJill Levine / Caroline Martin vs Lillian Belford / Tia Lopez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-21vs Elsea/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarey Haisten Matlock / Ashley Watkins vs Silang Sam / Lillian Belford6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMorgan Edwards vs Jaime Shelton6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Levine / Dori Waller vs Anna Straussberger / Catherine Stracker4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Boyd/Chattanooga42171327225
2Elsea/Chattanooga24131739293

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Lori Boyd
published
2.88
Megan Billingsley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Abbigail Henry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Karey Haisten Matlock
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Sathya Sanipina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Leanne Morrow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Jill Levine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Ashley Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Morgan Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Tatiana Dyskina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Boyd
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Megan Billingsley
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Abbigail Henry
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Karey Haisten Matlock
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sathya Sanipina
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Leanne Morrow
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jill Levine
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Ashley Watkins
5W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Morgan Edwards
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tatiana Dyskina
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.