Teams

SDNC 3.5 Park Hyatt Aviara/ Van Riet (3:2)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women- 3.5WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesJennifer van Riet / Michelle Gracey vs Michelle Porter / Nancy Willis4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Mulloy / Nahomi Kato vs Theresa Irick / Phyllis Miller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNahomi Kato / Jill Twombly vs Bunny Shin / Julia Simone4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer van Riet / Raquel Murphy vs Rebecca Christensen / Maureen Duncan3-6, 6-7
2022-05-16vs SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Manheim (3:2)Split 11
W#2 DoublesAllison Knepler / Jennifer van Riet vs Maeve Brick / Cynthia Noet6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNahomi Kato / Christy Mulloy vs Michelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Martelli / Jennifer van Riet vs Jean McDonald / Karen Rose6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer van Riet / Michelle Gracey vs Sally Prendergast / Donna Granholm7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNahomi Kato / Christy Mulloy vs Caroline Vance / Kristin Voeffray6-3, 6-1
2022-04-04vs SDNC 3.5 La Costa/ Zielinski (3:2)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer van Riet / Melissa van Loan vs Gina Rivera / Melanie Flaim5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.5WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kelson Splavec
published
3.65
Diane Silberman
published 4
3.51
Mary Beth Woulfe
published
3.49
Trudy Fore
published 3.5
3.39
Jill Twombly
published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer van Riet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Amanda Clardy
published 3.5
2.92
Nahomi Kato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Raquel Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Twombly + Mary Beth Woulfe2452% games+6.9% vs expected
Trudy Fore + Jill Twombly81051% games−0.9% vs expected
Trudy Fore + Mary Beth Woulfe404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelson Splavec
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%3%97%
3.74
4
Diane Silberman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Mary Beth Woulfe
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Trudy Fore
96W–89L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Jill Twombly
35W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Jennifer van Riet
24W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Amanda Clardy
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Nahomi Kato
90W–77L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92
Raquel Murphy
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.