Teams

Wade

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Adult 55 & Over Day Men 6.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Mark Rossi vs Geoff Silberman / Joe Lamari6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHarvey Evans / Richard McKeon vs James Carroll / Walter Spiegel6-3, 6-2
2021-08-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Mark Rossi vs Fouad Abbas / Michael Birger6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard McKeon / Todd Snyder vs Joe Lamari / Geoff Silberman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Mark Rossi vs Michael Binder / James Carroll7-6, 7-6
2021-07-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Wade / Richard McKeon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-28vs CarrollWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Raymond Barry vs Fred Shaw / Jeffrey Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Rossi / Richard McKeon vs Michael Binder / Walter Spiegel6-2, 6-3
2021-07-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / David Juppe vs Michael Binder / James Carroll2-6, 2-6
2021-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Mark Rossi vs Michael Birger / Jeffrey Smith6-1, 6-2
2021-06-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Richard McKeon vs Geoff Silberman / Michael Birger6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / David Juppe vs James Carroll / Walter Spiegel6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over Day Men 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Eric Putman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Mark Rossi
published
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
John Wade
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Richard McKeon3643% gamesnot enough data
Eric Putman + Richard McKeon4444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Putman
134W–201L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
2.98
Mark Rossi
13W–33L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 5 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.62
Raymond Barry
2W–16L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
2.50
John Wade
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.