Teams

Hills/R. Burkhart

2023 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesThor Moody / Sherwin Harden vs Rafael Garcia / Jerry Kenney7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-03-04vs Sun City Raqueteers - M. IrvingWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Sherwin Harden vs Brian Gray / Joe Izzo5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Costanza / Chris Wiley vs Neal Peterson / MILLER BASNIGHT2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-02-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesSherwin Harden / Thor Moody vs Jose Vivar / Rafael Garcia6-1, 7-6
2023-02-04vs Sun City Raqueteers - M. IrvingWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Costanza / Lawrence Palombo vs Mark Nelson / Brian Gray4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesByron Gibbs Wilson / Patrick Rairigh vs Michael Irving / Wayne Keyes7-6, 6-2
2023-01-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Paul Haley vs Jerry Kenney / Rafael Garcia6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Chen / Lawrence Palombo vs William Butler / John Figlewski6-0, 6-1
2023-01-14vs Sun City Raqueteers - M. IrvingWon 20
W#1 DoublesByron Gibbs Wilson / Michael Costanza vs Michael Irving / Brian Gray6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Chen / Lawrence Palombo vs Neal Peterson / MILLER BASNIGHT7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Thor Moody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Ken Coulter
published
3.30
Paul Haley
published
3.18
Robert Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Patrick Rairigh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Lawrence Palombo
published
3.08
Rick Burkhart
published
George Hawkins
published
Michael Costanza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard J Derr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Costanza + Patrick Rairigh12658% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Michael Costanza4155% gamesnot enough data
Rick Burkhart + Ken Coulter314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Patrick Rairigh213 matchesnot enough data
Lawrence Palombo + Rick Burkhart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Ken Coulter
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
Paul Haley
27W–29L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Robert Chen
158W–87L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Patrick Rairigh
108W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Lawrence Palombo
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Rick Burkhart
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Costanza
129W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard J Derr
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.