Teams

Coker - Mazarick

2025 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-01Split 11
L#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Robin Headrick vs Joshua Cappiello / Michael Rushing4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNirav Bhavsar / Drew Sheesley vs Drew Starr / Joseph Chakour6-4, 6-3
2025-04-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNirav Bhavsar / Robin Headrick vs Reza Abbas / Michael Lavin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Headrick / Harold Miller vs Reza Abbas / Earl Crouch6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPranesh Chandravelu / Karl Molnar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesNirav Bhavsar / Robin Headrick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Coker / Karl Molnar vs Joshua Cappiello / Earl Crouch7-6, 6-3
2025-03-27Won 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Zeickia Ledwell vs Joshua Cappiello / Earl Crouch6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHarold Miller / Nirav Bhavsar vs Reza Abbas / Michael Hicks6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPranesh Chandravelu / Robin Headrick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-13Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlex Hang / Karl Molnar vs Michael Hicks / Drew Starr6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHarold Miller / Nirav Bhavsar vs Michael Lavin / Reza Abbas6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Headrick / Drew Sheesley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobin Headrick / Nirav Bhavsar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Pham
published 3.5
3.24
Harold Miller
published
3.19
Karl Molnar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.17
Thomas Coker
published
2.84
Nirav Bhavsar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Robin Headrick
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.59
Alex Hang
published 3
Pranesh Chandravelu
published
Zeickia Ledwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nirav Bhavsar + Robin Headrick213 matchesnot enough data
Robin Headrick + Karl Molnar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Pham
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Harold Miller
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Karl Molnar
36W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.19
Thomas Coker
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Nirav Bhavsar
24W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Robin Headrick
13W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alex Hang
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Pranesh Chandravelu
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zeickia Ledwell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.