Teams

WI Combo 6.5 M NEL Valley Lin

2022 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#3 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Pramod Shinde vs Nathan Barash / Brandon Jonen6-3, 7-5
2022-12-11vs WI Combo 6.5 M NEL GBTC OberstadtLost 01
L#2 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Pramod Shinde vs Tom Leggett / Jack Palasota2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Pramod Shinde vs Nathan Barash / Brandon Jonen6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-10-30vs WI Combo 6.5 M NEL GBTC OberstadtWon 10
W#2 DoublesPramod Shinde / PIYUSH ATRE vs Tom Leggett / Jack Palasota7-6, 7-6
2022-10-30vs WI Combo 6.5 M NEL GBTC OberstadtWon 10
W#2 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Pramod Shinde vs Tom Leggett / Jack Palasota6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
David Gahagan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.19
Pramod Shinde
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.01
Steve Hale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
2.95
Chin-Yi Lin
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.84
Jonathan Paque
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
PIYUSH ATRE
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Robert Galinsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Paque + PIYUSH ATRE5448% games+5.2% vs expected
Chin-Yi Lin + Pramod Shinde2544% gamesnot enough data
Chin-Yi Lin + Steve Hale2441% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Paque + Chin-Yi Lin0520% gamesnot enough data
David Gahagan + Chin-Yi Lin134 matchesnot enough data
David Gahagan + Steve Hale224 matchesnot enough data
Chin-Yi Lin + PIYUSH ATRE213 matchesnot enough data
Pramod Shinde + PIYUSH ATRE213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Gahagan
75W–57L career · 18 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Pramod Shinde
45W–31L career · 12 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
Steve Hale
65W–42L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Chin-Yi Lin
50W–97L career · 11 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Jonathan Paque
37W–92L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
PIYUSH ATRE
33W–40L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Galinsky
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.