Teams

FOR The Love of Tennis

2025 55 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 7.0 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-07vs The Love BugsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Gross / Kerry Napper vs Kim Lonergan / Melinda Condos6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Lozano / Sharon Winter vs Maggie Everett / Lynn Platteborze6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRosemary Hickey / Kelly Reeve vs Shawna McCabe / Sandy Pena6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Kate Larimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Cheryl Lozano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Barbara Vance
published 3.5
3.32
Kerry Napper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Michelle Pettit
published
3.29
Sharon Winter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Tracie Costello
published
3.15
Gayle Land
published 3.5
3.14
Sheila Gentry
published
3.09
Cassie Villegas
published 3.5
3.05
Deborah Kirker
published 3.5
2.91
Elisa Caudill
published 3
2.67
Cynthia Shafer
published 3
Mallory Breen
published
Rosemary Hickey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Napper + Michelle Pettit18660% games+6.2% vs expected
Sharon Winter + Cheryl Lozano10256% games+5.6% vs expected
Rosemary Hickey + Sheila Gentry3251% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Vance + Gayle Land224 matchesnot enough data
Rosemary Hickey + Barbara Vance303 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Vance + Sheila Gentry213 matchesnot enough data
Elisa Caudill + Kate Larimer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Larimer
25W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Cheryl Lozano
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Barbara Vance
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Kerry Napper
31W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Michelle Pettit
31W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Sharon Winter
23W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Tracie Costello
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gayle Land
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sheila Gentry
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cassie Villegas
0W–13L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Deborah Kirker
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Elisa Caudill
15W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Cynthia Shafer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Mallory Breen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Hickey
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.