Teams

Reasner

2023 Decatur Southern Combo 55 and Over · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-23vs Lamar 7.5 Combo 55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKenny Coffey / Thomas Hargrove vs Akram Haggag / James Steele6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-20vs Lamar 7.5 Combo 55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKenny Coffey / Thomas Hargrove vs Gordon Siek / Yancy York4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kenny Coffey
published
3.67
Patton Watson
published
3.52
Kerwin Wade
published
3.37
Perry Baker
published
3.29
Keith Estes
published
3.24
George Ho-Tung
published 3.5
3.16
Edward O'Malley
published 3.5
3.15
Thomas Hargrove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Billy Driver
published 3.5
3.12
Dennis Reasner
published 3.5
2.91
Fred Burkert
published 3
Richard Allison
published
Steve Rowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenny Coffey + Patton Watson6257% games+4.2% vs expected
Dennis Reasner + Edward O'Malley2347% games−1.5% vs expected
Kenny Coffey + Perry Baker2453% gamesnot enough data
Perry Baker + Kerwin Wade044 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Reasner + Fred Burkert224 matchesnot enough data
Kenny Coffey + George Ho-Tung123 matchesnot enough data
Kenny Coffey + Keith Estes213 matchesnot enough data
Perry Baker + George Ho-Tung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenny Coffey
38W–30L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Patton Watson
77W–48L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
Kerwin Wade
23W–42L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Perry Baker
25W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
Keith Estes
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
George Ho-Tung
23W–30L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Edward O'Malley
28W–28L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Thomas Hargrove
88W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Billy Driver
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dennis Reasner
26W–48L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Fred Burkert
28W–52L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
Richard Allison
0W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Rowley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.