Teams

Sanford/Perry/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - TUES AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-25vs Rice/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesReed Sparta / Allison Varble vs Victoria Marcella / Suzanne Spalding7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Obremskey / Erica Smith vs Caroline Tapscott / Katelyn Thorne2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Maddaleni / Jelena Sanford vs Rachel Walker / Chelsea Rice3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-18vs Talbert/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesPenelope Sevier / Irina Miller vs Kristi Kelly / JULIE GONTAREK3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJelena Sanford / Reed Sparta vs Joy Cox / Helen Hopson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Varble / Emma Saddler vs Eileen Smith / Jill Talbert0-6, 5-7
2026-08-13vs Rice/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Margaret Guzik / Sue Anne Perry vs Victoria Marcella / Caroline Tapscott6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Coffman / Erica Smith vs Rachel Walker / Kacey Passmore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Perry / Nancy Campbell vs Katelyn Thorne / Loren Jackson4-6, 0-6
2026-08-11vs Faulkner/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrenda Maddaleni / Mary Margaret Guzik vs Heather Cole / Kari Smith2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Campbell / Stacy Perry vs Sarah Henderson / Sheila Ekedahl6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEmma Saddler / Jill Obremskey vs Ashley Henderson / Jennifer Spoletini1-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs Faulkner/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Anne Perry / Mary Margaret Guzik vs Kari Smith / Jennifer Spoletini6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJelena Sanford / Penelope Sevier vs Cristin Roark / Aimee Lawson3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Coffman / Irina Miller vs Sarah Henderson / Sheila Ekedahl1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - TUES AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Sue Anne Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Brenda Maddaleni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Nancy Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Penelope Sevier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Jelena Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Mary Margaret Guzik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Jill Obremskey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Allison Varble
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Emma Saddler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Irina Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Erica Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lucy McEuen
published
Melissa Work
published
Reed Sparta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Anne Perry + Mary Margaret Guzik404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Anne Perry
20W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brenda Maddaleni
18W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Nancy Campbell
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
Penelope Sevier
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Jelena Sanford
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Mary Margaret Guzik
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jill Obremskey
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Allison Varble
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Emma Saddler
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.58
Irina Miller
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Erica Smith
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lucy McEuen
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Work
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Reed Sparta
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.