Teams

Falgout/18/4.0-3.0/Tri/BEVR

2025 LAF Tri Level 18 & Over - Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Laf (18&O) Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-05vs Conradi/18/4.5-3.5/TRI/OCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacob Cieslak / Hayden Boagni vs Christopher Cook / Guy Harper6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Trey Copeland vs Thomas Hesse / Zachary Lemoine6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Bui / Jerad Hayes vs Jake Marler / Scott Allen6-1, 6-4
2025-07-29vs Henagan/18/4.0-3.0/TRI/BSCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBruce Stalling / Jacob Cieslak vs Philip Ledet / Christopher Sammons III5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Falgout / Brad Parfait vs Adam James / Seth LaHaye0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Bui / Jerad Hayes vs Ryan Bordelon / Jeffrey Peatross6-4, 7-6
2025-07-22vs Conradi/18/4.5-3.5/TRI/OCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Stalling / Hayden Boagni vs Jason Quinlan / Morris Belaire3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlex Falgout / Phillip Edmond vs Chris Wexler / Jason Guidry6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Bui / Jerad Hayes vs Edward Breaux / Carter Kauffman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Laf (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jacob Cieslak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Bruce Stalling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Phillip Edmond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Hayden Boagni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Alex Falgout
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Brad Parfait
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jerad Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Wehrkamp
published
Trey Copeland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trey Copeland + Phillip Edmond3256% games+4.2% vs expected
Bruce Stalling + Hayden Boagni134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Cieslak
16W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Bruce Stalling
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Phillip Edmond
34W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Hayden Boagni
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Alex Falgout
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Brad Parfait
3W–23L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Jerad Hayes
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Wehrkamp
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trey Copeland
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.