Teams

PC-Landefeld

2022 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-21vs IND-LutzLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnelise Anderson / Jodi Landefeld vs Melissa Ching / Yukiko Lutz6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-21vs YTC-FranklinLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnelise Anderson / Jodi Landefeld vs Gena Franklin / Rebecca Stewart Rust6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-20vs YTC-DeGrasseWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnelise Anderson / Jodi Landefeld vs Dawn Degrasse / Karen Tomerlin6-4, 7-5
2022-08-20vs YTC-StriebLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnelise Anderson / Jodi Landefeld vs Maureen Strieb / Kristin Larson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-Strieb4040021
2IND-Lutz3131432
3PC-Landefeld1313641
4YTC-DeGrasse0404850

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.48 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Annelise Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Elece Fiocchi
published 4.5
Jodi Landefeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elece Fiocchi + Jodi Landefeld4158% gamesnot enough data
Annelise Anderson + Jodi Landefeld134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Annelise Anderson
53W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Elece Fiocchi
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Jodi Landefeld
29W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.