Teams

Payne Park Panthers

2021 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-02-20vs Laurel Oak CarpenterWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Cheri Starn vs Carrie Walsh / Sandra Poston6-1, 6-2
2021-01-23vs Sarasota - SSC/SolomonLost 02
L#2 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Christina DeCarlo vs Kimberly LaLima / Lori Campbell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberley Pelyk / Karen Nejdawi vs Heidi Grimes / Karen Nicholson0-6, 0-6
2021-01-16vs Jacaranda Double TroubleLost 01
L#2 SinglesKaren Nejdawi vs Lynn Inganamort3-6, 3-6
2021-01-09Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKaren Nejdawi vs Roda Rucks0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Svetlana Janglin
published 4
3.71
Jackie Dedrick
published 4
Gigi Silverberg
published 3.5
3.21
Betsy Winder
published 3.5
3.16
Karen Nejdawi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Christina DeCarlo
published
Kim Roellig
published
Kimberley Pelyk
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Travers
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Claudia Ellen Zimmerman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jackie Dedrick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ginger Griffith-Schirmer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Gigi Silverberg
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Winder
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Karen Nejdawi
41W–64L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Christina DeCarlo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Roellig
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberley Pelyk
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Travers
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.