Teams

SS-LT PURPLE

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-28vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichele Cunningham / Daniel Greer vs Karl Andreasen / Mindy Tabakin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-21vs WP ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Wilson / Sean Hudelson vs Louis Engleberg / Elise Engleberg1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarcela Rascon / Justin Eisner vs Diem Phan-Boyer / Jacob Toffler4-6, 6-7
2024-04-14vs RRTC ORANGESplit 11
L#2 DoublesJustin Eisner / Michele Cunningham vs Christina Kent / Juan Pablo Sanchez Narvaez1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSean Hudelson / Maggie Wilson vs Steve Mazzini / Shannon Hickey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-07vs GAC BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Eisner / Michele Cunningham vs Daniel Green / Maeve Kearney1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Jaren Katz
published
4.35
Maggie Wilson
published
4.31
James Jaggers
published
4.23
Michele Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Justin Eisner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Travis Beard
published
3.88
Daniel Greer
published 4
3.85
Colleen Carlson
published 4
3.75
Sean Hudelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
William Wall
published
Laura Downie
published
Marcela Rascon
published
Rory Jaggers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Cunningham + Justin Eisner1832% gamesnot enough data
Sean Hudelson + Colleen Carlson044 matchesnot enough data
William Wall + Marcela Rascon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaren Katz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.68
Maggie Wilson
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
James Jaggers
28W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Michele Cunningham
72W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Justin Eisner
35W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Travis Beard
15W–20L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Daniel Greer
37W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Colleen Carlson
13W–40L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Sean Hudelson
53W–92L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
William Wall
9W–25L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.73
Laura Downie
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcela Rascon
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rory Jaggers
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.