Teams

Kim 3.5 18+

2024 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-19vs I'd Hit That 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMofei Chen / Louis Fung vs James Smith / Tom Norris6-4, 6-1
2024-06-12vs Game ChangersLost 01
L#2 DoublesLouis Fung / Mofei Chen vs Jaeil Ahn / Hyung Joon Kwon2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-07vs Game ChangersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBo Liang / Mofei Chen vs Young Seung Kim / Insung Kang6-2, 7-5
2024-05-19vs I'd Hit That 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesXiao Liu / Mofei Chen vs Jagannath Surampudi / Alexandre Fines2-6, 4-6
2024-05-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesJunyi Shi / Zeyang Shen vs Moe Haidar / Ed Francell Jr6-2, 6-0
2024-04-24vs Hit MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesZeyang Shen / Junyi Shi vs Christopher Bragale / Dileep Nair1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-19vs Blazing DodgersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJunyi Shi / Zeyang Shen vs Nima Mossavari / Yingyos Jittayasothorn2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-12vs Smiles and LaughsLost 01
L#2 DoublesXiao Liu / Mofei Chen vs Wei Huang / Renhuan Xu1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Louis Fung
published
3.38
Jun Hee Kim
published
3.37
Mofei Chen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Junyi Shi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Xiao Liu
published
3.18
Kameron Hnath
published
3.15
Mark Tyler
published
2.94
Woo Jin Shim
published
2.87
Bo Liang
published 3
2.80
Hyun Soo Kim
published
Lujin Zhao
published
Ping-Jung Liu
published
Zeyang Shen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Junyi Shi + Mofei Chen4554% gamesnot enough data
Louis Fung + Mark Tyler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louis Fung
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jun Hee Kim
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Mofei Chen
31W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Junyi Shi
54W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Xiao Liu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kameron Hnath
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
Woo Jin Shim
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Bo Liang
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Hyun Soo Kim
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
Lujin Zhao
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ping-Jung Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zeyang Shen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.