Teams

Matchpoint

2021 Tri-Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-11vs SportsplexWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Gaspari / Gabriela Medina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTina Hartley / Debra Hendricks vs Tammy Ferrari / Judy Godfrey7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMaureen Davidson / Margaret Pedziwiatr vs Elizabeth Fischer / Alyce Kosofsky2-6, 3-6
2021-03-21vs PTC Smart AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Andrea Piehler / Alison Spear6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMargaret Pedziwiatr / Eva Stanley vs Gillian Cobb / Susan Davidson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Reid / Rachael Sheffield vs Caroline Conston / Melanie Redl6-2, 7-6
2021-03-14vs TaconicLost 12
L#1 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Nicole Klausz / Jillian Muro6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTina Hartley / Debra Hendricks vs Andria McKenna / Ronni Jarvis6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Pedziwiatr / Kelly Henson vs Sharon Pearlman / Mayan Abecasis6-1, 6-1
2021-03-07vs Cross CourtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Gaspari / Roge Nesbitt vs Laura Thomas / Kelly Thompson6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKelly Henson / Margaret Pedziwiatr vs Elizabeth Hammond / Diana Regini7-5, 6-2
2021-02-28vs SportsplexSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna vs Wanda Nadal / Rebecca Wehrle6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMaureen Davidson / Carlys Lemler vs Elizabeth Fischer / Judy Godfrey2-6, 1-6
2021-02-06vs Cross CourtLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Gaspari / Gabriela Medina vs Laura Thomas / Kelly Thompson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Hendricks / Kelly Henson vs Katrina Duffy / Yvonne Walker6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachael Sheffield / Kelly Reid vs Christina Bookless / Elizabeth Hammond4-6, 3-6
2021-01-31vs PTC Smart AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Navina Hooker / Andrea Moss6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTina Hartley / Lilla Faint vs Andrea Piehler / Gillian Cobb1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Pedziwiatr / Maureen Davidson vs Hilary Cloos / Melanie Redl6-3, 6-3
2021-01-24vs TaconicWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Sampson / Gabriela Medina vs Katherine Curcio / Michelle Daleo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTina Hartley / Debra Hendricks vs Mary Berezowsky / Heidi DeSiena7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaureen Davidson / Kelly Henson vs Maria Moise / Jennifer Tice6-3, 6-1
2021-01-09vs Heath/DuganWon 10
W#1 DoublesAntaeya Foster / Gabriela Medina vs Wendy Boiardi / Julia Cho6-2, 6-2
2020-09-26vs Heath/DuganWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabriela Medina / Antaeya Foster vs Wendy Boiardi / Julia Cho6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Matchpoint62141022193
2Sportsplex35101434252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Gabriela Medina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Roge Nesbitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Deirdre Gaspari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kelly Reid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Tammy Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Eva Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Debra Hendricks
published 3.5
2.89
Lilla Faint
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Margaret Pedziwiatr
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Carlys Lemler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Maryalice Lee-Bout
published
Kelly Henson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Makaela Hung
published
Maureen Davidson
published
Tina Hartley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roge Nesbitt + Victoria Madonna1259952% games+0.3% vs expected
Tammy Sampson + Deirdre Gaspari2838% games−9.4% vs expected
Maureen Davidson + Margaret Pedziwiatr123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Henson + Margaret Pedziwiatr213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gabriela Medina
54W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Roge Nesbitt
235W–170L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Deirdre Gaspari
53W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Victoria Madonna
240W–163L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelly Reid
64W–66L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Tammy Sampson
29W–74L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Eva Stanley
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Debra Hendricks
9W–13L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
Lilla Faint
45W–42L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Margaret Pedziwiatr
148W–123L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Carlys Lemler
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2021
0%55%45%
2.48
Maryalice Lee-Bout
4W–18L career · no lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
2.18
Kelly Henson
50W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Makaela Hung
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Davidson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tina Hartley
16W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.