Teams

YMCA Ritchie

2026 OH OV Spring · SummerA18&O

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-13vs YMCA SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Ritchie / Ethan Shepard vs Matthew Sutton / JJ Casto3-0
W#1 SinglesNoah Fulks vs Brian Delcotto6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJaymes Haggerty vs Joshua Lawson6-2, 6-0
2026-07-12vs YMCA SuttonWon 40
W#1 DoublesRyon Zent / Scott Zent vs Brian McCutcheon / Tanner Whipkey6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJaymes Haggerty vs Joshua Lawson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNoah Fulks / William Sinclair vs Matthew Sutton / Jon Hoh6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChristopher Ritchie vs Brian Delcotto6-3, 6-1
2026-07-09vs YMCA SuttonWon 40
W#1 DoublesJaymes Haggerty / Reid Bailey vs Brian Delcotto / Adam Tolliver6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJames Mcintosh vs Greg Geremia6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ritchie / Ethan Shepard vs Jon Hoh / JJ Casto6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlex Stacy vs Brian McCutcheon6-1, 6-1
2026-06-28vs YMCA SuttonWon 40
W#1 DoublesWilliam Sinclair / Ethan Shepard vs JJ Casto / Jon Hoh6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoah Fulks vs Brian Delcotto6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJaymes Haggerty / Reid Bailey vs Matthew Sutton / Adam Tolliver6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGrayson Millette vs Brian McCutcheon6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SummerA18&O have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Christopher Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Ethan Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Alex Stacy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Grayson Millette
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
James Mcintosh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Jaymes Haggerty
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.97
Noah Fulks
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Reid Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ryon Zent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Zent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Ritchie
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Ethan Shepard
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Alex Stacy
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Grayson Millette
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
James Mcintosh
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jaymes Haggerty
15W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
Noah Fulks
24W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
Reid Bailey
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryon Zent
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scott Zent
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.